Types of Errors
Every measurement has an error. Identifying its type tells you how to reduce or correct for it.
Concept
By Source
- Systematic errors — Consistent, reproducible bias. Same direction every time.
- Instrumental (zero error, miscalibrated scale)
- Imperfect technique (parallax, mounting tilt)
- Environmental (constant temperature drift)
- Random errors — Unpredictable fluctuations in either direction. Caused by inherent fluctuations, judgement noise, vibrations.
- Gross errors — Outright mistakes: misreading, mis-recording, wrong scale.
Reducing Each Type
| Type | How to reduce |
|---|---|
| Systematic | Calibrate, correct for known offsets, change method |
| Random | Repeat and average; reduces as |
| Gross | Care; cross-check; reject outliers |
Quantifying Error
Suppose true value is , measured value is .
- Absolute error . Same units as the quantity.
- Mean absolute error for readings: .
- Relative error (dimensionless).
- Percent error .
Best Estimate
When no "true" value is known, the mean of repeated readings is the best estimate. Uncertainty is the mean absolute error or the standard deviation.
Worked Example
Q: Five measurements of a resistor: . Find the best estimate, mean absolute error, relative error, and percent error.
Solution:
Mean: .
Deviations: , , , , .
Mean absolute error: .
Relative error: .
Percent error: .
So we report , or .
Common Confusions
- "Random errors can be eliminated by careful work." — They can be reduced by averaging but never eliminated; they are statistical in nature.
- "A zero error is a random error." — No, it's systematic. The needle reads the same offset each time.
- Absolute error has units; relative and percent errors do not.
Key Takeaways
- Systematic errors bias accuracy; random errors degrade precision; gross errors are mistakes.
- Best estimate = mean of repeated readings.
- Uncertainty can be reported as mean absolute error, relative error, or percent error.
- Always report measurements as best estimate ± uncertainty.